Massachusetts Law About Trade Secrets
For many years, courts in Massachusetts relied on a six part test under the common law to determine if information was a trade secret. In 2018, a new statute took effect that provides a specific definition of "trade secret."
If you are considering the effect of a non compete agreement, it is important to remember that the agreement can protect "confidential information" even if that information does not fully meet the test for a trade secret. It is also important to remember that if something is a trade secret, you are obligated not to misappropriate or misuse it even if you do not have an agreement with your employer. What Is a Trade SecretIn broad terms, trade secret law protects certain information only so long as its secrecy is maintained. Once the information is disclosed to the public, it loses its secrecy and is therefore no longer protected.
One example is when a company files for patent protection on an idea or process. In order to get a patent monopoly, the company or inventor has to publicly disclose the invention. Once that occurs, the company has to rely on the patent process to protect its idea, as trace secret law will no longer apply. A trade secret under Massachusetts law is defined as "specified or specifiable information" that meets two tests:
Economic Value From SecrecyWith respect to the first test, the information not only must have value or potential value, but that value must be connected to the fact that others do not know the information.
Further, it must not be "readily ascertainable." Something that can be figured out by someone else with the same education or experience in a relatively short period of time is likely not a trade secret. In contrast, a compilation of information, even information from public sources, that takes many hundreds of people hours and/or many months might be considered a trade secret. There is always a tension in trade secret law between things an employee knows through general experience and "know-how" and actual protectible secrets of the employer. Whether the information is readily gleaned by others with similar experience and expertise is a critical point in a trade secret case. |
We're Here to Help.OR
|
Questions About Employer Confidential Information or a Non Compete Agreement?
Our Solutions Roadmap is a quick and easy way to share the details of what you are facing and receive preliminary feedback from a member of our team. Use the button below to get started- it is 100% confidential and 100% free.
Reasonable Measures to Protect Secrecy
Under both common law and the new statute, companies must be vigilant about protecting their trade secrets. There is no bright line test, other than "reasonable under the circumstances."
At a minimum, companies should require their employees with access to the confidential information to sign nondisclosure agreements. They should also take measures to ensure that only those employees who need to use the information have access to it.
It is also important to monitor and enforce the NDAs in place with employees. A company who requires NDAs but never takes action when employees leave and use trade secrets could lose its protection.
At a minimum, companies should require their employees with access to the confidential information to sign nondisclosure agreements. They should also take measures to ensure that only those employees who need to use the information have access to it.
It is also important to monitor and enforce the NDAs in place with employees. A company who requires NDAs but never takes action when employees leave and use trade secrets could lose its protection.
What is Misappropriation of a Trade Secret
Misappropriation can be the acquisition, use, or disclosure of a trade secret. Acquisition by another can be unlawful if it was done through improper means or through someone else who obtained the information through improper means.
Use or disclosure of a trade secret will be considered unlawful if the person knew or should have known that it was acquired through improper means, acquired from someone with a duty not to disclose, or acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to protect the information.
Some examples of acquiring information through improper means include:
Use or disclosure of a trade secret will be considered unlawful if the person knew or should have known that it was acquired through improper means, acquired from someone with a duty not to disclose, or acquired under circumstances giving rise to a duty to protect the information.
Some examples of acquiring information through improper means include:
- Receiving it from someone in violation of their NDA.
- Obtaining the information under false pretenses.
- Physically or digitally trespassing to obtain the information.
Enforcement of Trade Secret Rights
An employee does not have to have an NDA to have a duty to protect trade secrets. So long as the information meets the definition of a trade secret, the employer can enforce its rights. Remember, however, that the absence of NDAs may be evidence that the employer did not sufficiently protect its secret.
An employer can bring a civil action seeking injunctive relief and money damages for misuse or disclosure of a trade secret. Under the new Massachusetts trade secrets law effective October 1, 2018, the prevailing party in a trade secret suit may be able to recover its attorneys fees and costs from the other side. This relief is available if the claim was made or defended in bad faith.
Attorneys fees and possible double damages are also available if the court finds the use or disclosure of trade secrets was willful and malicious.
An employer can bring a civil action seeking injunctive relief and money damages for misuse or disclosure of a trade secret. Under the new Massachusetts trade secrets law effective October 1, 2018, the prevailing party in a trade secret suit may be able to recover its attorneys fees and costs from the other side. This relief is available if the claim was made or defended in bad faith.
Attorneys fees and possible double damages are also available if the court finds the use or disclosure of trade secrets was willful and malicious.
Confidential Information That is Not a Trade Secret
There are some types of information that businesses consider proprietary and confidential that do not meet the two part test for a trade secret. Examples may include certain customer or pricing information.
Confidential information will still support enforcement of an otherwise valid noncompetition agreement. Employers can also protect this information by contract in a non disclosure agreement that defines confidential information broadly.
Confidential information will still support enforcement of an otherwise valid noncompetition agreement. Employers can also protect this information by contract in a non disclosure agreement that defines confidential information broadly.
Meet Our Employment and Non Compete Lawyers
Emily Smith-Lee is the owner and founder of slnlaw. She is a 1996 graduate of Boston College Law School. She was previously a partner at the Boston office of a large international firm, where she worked for thirteen years before starting the firm that became slnlaw in 2009. She has been recognized as Massachusetts Superlawyer each year since 2013, and in 2018 earned recognition as one of Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly's Lawyers of the Year. She has written a book on employment law: Rules of the Road, What You Need to Know About Employment Laws in Massachusetts, been interviewed by the Massachusetts Superlawyers magazine about non compete agreements, and written an op-ed in the New York Times about the dangers of non competes. Along with the rest of the slnlaw team, she has helped hundreds of clients navigate, negotiate, or defend against their non compete agreements.
Rebecca Rogers: Rebecca is a 2006 graduate of Boston College Law School, and has worked with slnlaw since 2013. She previously worked as an intellectual property litigation attorney for Fish & Richardson in Boston, Massachusetts, and clerked for the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Rebecca has helped many clients understand and evaluate their non compete agreements and develop strategies for defending against non compete enforcement and negotiating resolution.
Jenna Ordway: Jenna is a 2013 graduate of Quinnipiac Law School, and also earned an LLM in Taxation from Boston University in 2015. She has been affiliated with slnlaw since 2011, first as a law clerk and then as an attorney. Jenna has been recognized since 2019 as a "Rising Star" by Massachusetts Superlawyers. Jenna works with employers to develop reasonable and enforceable employee agreements, including non competes. She has also helped employees understand and evaluate their non compete agreements and develop strategies for defending against non compete enforcement and negotiating resolution.
Elijah Bresley: Eli is a 2014 graduate of Seton Hall Law school, and has worked with slnlaw since 2020. He previously worked for a boutique employment law firm outside of Boston, and then for the Labor and Employment department of a large Boston firm. He also spent a year clerking for the judges of the Superior Court in Hartford, Connecticut. Eli has helped clients both evaluate and negotiate their non compete agreements, and defended non compete claims in state and federal courts.
How We Can Help
If you are a business owner seeking to protect trade secrets or an employee facing the threat of a trade secret lawsuit, we can help. You can use the button below to schedule a call back from a member of our team, or give us a call at 781-784-2322.